Mowl
Member
Great to see ROC handing some ass to Roundy and Val about their forays into the pink-fleshed happy-tranny world they skirt the edge of (pun intended) without getting immediately banned from the site for telling the truth:
www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com
'loathe drag shows.
That said, the point of drag is for sexually diverse males (gay, transexual, transvestites, queens) to vent a pent up identity that their culture has pathologised.
If our culture had not pathologised and tried to repress it, they would just wear dresses, act like girls.
Like for example Val and Dan on this forum (they have even given us a glimpse of their wearing dresses and living out their female personas on camera).
But look to cultures that have been much less repressed, been much more open, historically, that have embraced a wider set of gender and sexual identities for centuries, probably thousands of years.
You find their language encompasses terms like Mahu ('in the middle'), taking Native Tahitian culture for illustration. Or Kathoey in Thailand, Kothi and Hijra in India, Femminiello in Italy, Muxe in Mexico, and Travesti in South America.
These cultures embraced the reality of some young boys exhibiting feminine energy, and simply raised them alongside the girls.
Perhaps if Val and Dan had not been raised in such repressive, oppressive conditions, they would be much more natural in expressing their sexual and gender identities today, and not beset by such an assortment of twitches, horrendous fashion sense, strange egoism, etc.
Personally I have socially mixed with both drag queens, and "girls" in cultures where it is normal.
The drag queens have a strange egoism, they are not themselves, you are aware of a mask, you cannot make genuine connections, at least I was not able to connect (many times I tried, being polite, social, unjudgemental).
Whereas the "mahu" or "hirja" or "travesti" were completely different. E.g. If you were up very late at night, suddenly one would appear, coming through the trees, or a doorway, bringing with them excitement, gossip, glamour, difference, fun, genuine, and warm interest in all the goings on.
You could see they served a valued function in the life of the culture.
Whereas the puritanical Christian missionaries in the early 19th century left their mark.
What I'm trying to get at is that repression is bad. I would say many of the contributors to this forum are testament to one or other form of repression. Not just sexual or gender repression, but other types of repression also. Evil comes out of repression...'
Nice one.
Fat Yank in a blond wig meets dumb culchie with balloon tits NEWS SHOCKER!
General Chat For All To Read.
Humble apologies, I was referring to Val himself and was thinking of him as an OLD lad, overlooking the fact that we already had an Auld Lad! Which is why I am YOUNGdan
www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com
'loathe drag shows.
That said, the point of drag is for sexually diverse males (gay, transexual, transvestites, queens) to vent a pent up identity that their culture has pathologised.
If our culture had not pathologised and tried to repress it, they would just wear dresses, act like girls.
Like for example Val and Dan on this forum (they have even given us a glimpse of their wearing dresses and living out their female personas on camera).
But look to cultures that have been much less repressed, been much more open, historically, that have embraced a wider set of gender and sexual identities for centuries, probably thousands of years.
You find their language encompasses terms like Mahu ('in the middle'), taking Native Tahitian culture for illustration. Or Kathoey in Thailand, Kothi and Hijra in India, Femminiello in Italy, Muxe in Mexico, and Travesti in South America.
These cultures embraced the reality of some young boys exhibiting feminine energy, and simply raised them alongside the girls.
Perhaps if Val and Dan had not been raised in such repressive, oppressive conditions, they would be much more natural in expressing their sexual and gender identities today, and not beset by such an assortment of twitches, horrendous fashion sense, strange egoism, etc.
Personally I have socially mixed with both drag queens, and "girls" in cultures where it is normal.
The drag queens have a strange egoism, they are not themselves, you are aware of a mask, you cannot make genuine connections, at least I was not able to connect (many times I tried, being polite, social, unjudgemental).
Whereas the "mahu" or "hirja" or "travesti" were completely different. E.g. If you were up very late at night, suddenly one would appear, coming through the trees, or a doorway, bringing with them excitement, gossip, glamour, difference, fun, genuine, and warm interest in all the goings on.
You could see they served a valued function in the life of the culture.
Whereas the puritanical Christian missionaries in the early 19th century left their mark.
What I'm trying to get at is that repression is bad. I would say many of the contributors to this forum are testament to one or other form of repression. Not just sexual or gender repression, but other types of repression also. Evil comes out of repression...'
Nice one.
Fat Yank in a blond wig meets dumb culchie with balloon tits NEWS SHOCKER!
