Home
By:
Filters

Arsefield's Hall of Shame

Mowl said:
You are aware that you're conducting a conversation with a complete stranger on another site altogether, Jambo?

How fucking long does it take you to figure out your answer to a question you were asked weeks before you were kicked off the very site the person you're replying to is on? How come you're always around three weeks past the point of any interest whatsoever before you finally whimper out some lame and tired bullshit replyyou borrowed from your girlfriend, Keith Woods?

You're like the drunk guy alone at the end of the bar who lost the argument two hours ago but then pipes up with:

'...and ANOTHER thing....'

Mongrel mutts who've just been run over by a freight truck have sharper and more incisive wit, Jimmy.

You should find another hobby: alcoholism isn't working out for you.
Click to expand...
You're far too stupid to realise that all you do here every day is make a fool of yourself.

Your followers on Arsefield's (who all hate your fucking guts 😆) only follow you because you're my #1 pest/bunny boiler.
 
Electricity said:
You're far too stupid to realise that all you do here every day is embarrass yourself.
Click to expand...

I keep you entertained.

Something your neighbours appreciate, I'm sure.

Not to mention your Da.

Electricity said:
Your followers on Arsefield's (who all hate your fucking guts 😆) only follow you because you're my number #1 pest/bunny boiler.
Click to expand...

So you have a crush on Glenn Close as well as Susanna Horffs?




You really need to get over your Ma tapping out like that.
 
Mowl said:
I keep you entertained.
Click to expand...
Only when I want you to be.

It's entirely on my terms and at a time of my choosing.

You lost all of your LA privileges with me in terms of being taken in any way seriously ages ago, forever really. You're garbage, you're a garbage human being

Mowl said:
Something your neighbours appreciate, I'm sure.

Not to mention your Da.



So you have a crush on Glenn Close as well as Susanna Horffs?




You really need to get over your Ma tapping out like that.
Click to expand...
 
Jambo, make a cogent reply and there is no problem. But stupid Telegram videos and childish inane deflections just descend into nonsense. You are welcome to make a proper response. But you are not welcome to rehash tangential Telegram memes, and do that stupid rabbithole thing you learned from your "Bugster" script.
 
roc_abilly said:
Jambo, make a cogent reply and there is no problem. But stupid Telegram videos and childish inane deflections just descend into nonsense. You are welcome to make a proper response. But you are not welcome to rehash tangential Telegram memes, and do that stupid rabbithole thing you learned from your "Bugster" script.
Click to expand...
I did make a "cogent reply".. and an attempt to cut through all your bluster and bullshit

This is how the conversation should have gone (saving everyone's fucking time) -

You:
Surely a mong of your professed high IQ Jambo would understand the difference between questions of correlation and causation?

Me:
Eeny, meeny, miny, moe.

Do you have any particular lie in mind? 🤔

You:
Scientifically, the black arrests may be higher for reasons including say the greater poverty of blacks, their inequality with whites, prejudice of white people against them.
 
But my point was that statistics says nothing about causation.

I don't know either if the above comprise the causes, anymore than you mighr think it's something in their DNA - from the statistics presented.

I made my point clear as day.

But all you have in response to that point is a pretend conversation that you'd like to have?

Fuck off.

Is this a conversation mogarot, collot and woodso went through before, so that you know how it goes?

Get off those youtube and telegram videos Jambo and engage with the real world.

You're some clown.
 
roc_abilly said:
But my point was that statistics says nothing about causation.

I don't know either if the above comprise the causes, anymore than you mighr think it's something in their DNA - from the statistics presented.

I made my point clear as day.

But all you have in response to that point is a pretend conversation that you'd like to have?

Fuck off.

Is this a conversation mogarot, collot and woodso went through before, so that you know how it goes?

Get off those youtube and telegram videos Jambo and engage with the real world.

You're some clown.
Click to expand...
You imagined that you were the only smarty-pants in the room (who knew that correlation is not causation)

I asked you if you had one, or many lies in mind (to explain why blacks disproportionately commit crime)

The conversation should have gone as above, and now you're still wasting everyone's time
 
So trying to follow your "logic", as you present here, why is any explanation other than that it's something in their DNA, to be considered "a lie" in your worldview? Implying you are the one that has "the truth"?
 
roc_abilly said:
So trying to follow your "logic", as you present here, why is any explanation other than that it's something in their DNA, to be considered "a lie" in your worldview? Implying you are the one that has "the truth"?
Click to expand...
First of all, race denialism is lying

Secondly, all of the reasons you gave are standard bullshit (muh socioeconomic, muh white racism, muh inequality..)
 
No, pointing out to people that the widest dna variances between people are not cross-racial, they are individual, is where the truth lies.

If you just say, well there are variances between races, deliberately omitting a discussion of relative magnitudes (essentially making something out of an ant next to a skyscraper, pretending the skyscraper is not there), then you are telling a lie.

That's aside from bullshit statistics.

For example if we conditioned that data you posted on the other thread on different ages, the data would likely have supported (intuitively) entirely different stories.

But this racist dogma and those who promote it are selecting these data specifically to try and trigger these type of associations, and give it a veneer of science (the poor muppets it's aimed at don't recognise science, but they easily kowtow to scientism, a fact these stupid white supremacists play on).
 
roc_abilly said:
No, pointing out to people that the widest dna variances between people are not cross-racial, they are individual, is where the truth lies.
Click to expand...
No, it's a well worn-out race denialism lie (already demolished you on this)

roc_abilly said:
If you just say, well there are variances between races, deliberately omitting a discussion of relative magnitudes (essentially making something out of an ant next to a skyscraper, pretending the skyscraper is not there), then you are telling a lie.

That's aside from bullshit statistics.

For example if we conditioned that data you posted on the other thread on different ages, the data would likely have supported (intuitively) entirely different stories.

But this racist dogma and those who promote it are selecting these data specifically to try and trigger these type of associations, and give it a veneer of science (the poor muppets it's aimed at don't recognise science, but they easily kowtow to scientism, a fact these stupid white supremacists play on).
Click to expand...
One of the reasons that race denialism is such a pernicious, anti-white lie, is that if we take someone like you (a race denier) at face value, then you almost have to believe that it has something to do with whites
 
What do you even say to such utter delusions. The only thing you ever "demolished" Jambo is a crate of dutch gold in one sitting and your tiny willy red raw from trying to squeeze one last erection from it before you gave up for the night and floated off to soap bar dreams of white European girls who wouldn't dream of going near you with a barge pole.
 
Here, do us all a favour when they let you back onto the gay bar site (we can see you adding facepalms like a little girl who pissed her little panties) and show that fucking dope JPC who works in the civil service what an apostrophe's for, would you?

I want to throw something pointy at the stupid cunt.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom