roc_abilly
Member
The usual shit over on Arsefields.
They're all "free speech" if it's about their members having anonymous impunity to say shit about outside groups, communities, individuals, not there to defend themselves.
But if someone comes on and makes the case for any of these "outsider" communities or individuals, that upsets their little catchcries, and consensuses, narratives, slogans, they don't like that.
It's all one-sided.
----------------deleted from Arsefields -------------------
The fact of Saul dying, and perhaps having suffered, doesn't change the fact that he was a horrible, racist little shit, full of appalling ignorance, violence and the dumbest conspiracist mindedness, whose thoughts and words on these fora undeniably put out into the world toxic, hateful, currents of ignorance.
I would conjecture also that the foul worldly deeds Mowl alludes to, of old age pensioners being targeted and robbed by his family members, was indeed some type of fruit of these type of thoughts and words of his.
Now granted, in this country, we tend not to speak ill of the dead. At least for some period. I myself in believing that "on the balance of propabilities" there may be a God, and that he or she or "they" may well now be judging Saul - that means that the earthly judgememt I once held should now be turned to compassion, as I would doubt he would not be facing some type of atonement, perhaps terrible in nature.
But there are those also who have decided "on the balance of probabilities", and, or based on their earthly experiences, that there is no God, and thereby it is up to the people of this earth to continue judging him, even into death, for otherwise, if you give such thoughts words and deeds impunity, there lies much peril upon that road, and one is duty bound not to turn away from it.
And that is as it should be. It is just as valid a position as not speaking ill of the dead, probably more valid in reality.
----------------deleted from Arsefields -------------------
An entirely reasonable post. Only it upset the smug little consensus.
Also deleted yesterday was a post I made demonstrating two sides of Swordid.
Free speech my hole. Call it what it is. I.e. A platform to spew anonymous ignorance with impunity at groups and individuals not there to defend themselves, or to present their case.
They're all "free speech" if it's about their members having anonymous impunity to say shit about outside groups, communities, individuals, not there to defend themselves.
But if someone comes on and makes the case for any of these "outsider" communities or individuals, that upsets their little catchcries, and consensuses, narratives, slogans, they don't like that.
It's all one-sided.
----------------deleted from Arsefields -------------------
The fact of Saul dying, and perhaps having suffered, doesn't change the fact that he was a horrible, racist little shit, full of appalling ignorance, violence and the dumbest conspiracist mindedness, whose thoughts and words on these fora undeniably put out into the world toxic, hateful, currents of ignorance.
I would conjecture also that the foul worldly deeds Mowl alludes to, of old age pensioners being targeted and robbed by his family members, was indeed some type of fruit of these type of thoughts and words of his.
Now granted, in this country, we tend not to speak ill of the dead. At least for some period. I myself in believing that "on the balance of propabilities" there may be a God, and that he or she or "they" may well now be judging Saul - that means that the earthly judgememt I once held should now be turned to compassion, as I would doubt he would not be facing some type of atonement, perhaps terrible in nature.
But there are those also who have decided "on the balance of probabilities", and, or based on their earthly experiences, that there is no God, and thereby it is up to the people of this earth to continue judging him, even into death, for otherwise, if you give such thoughts words and deeds impunity, there lies much peril upon that road, and one is duty bound not to turn away from it.
And that is as it should be. It is just as valid a position as not speaking ill of the dead, probably more valid in reality.
----------------deleted from Arsefields -------------------
An entirely reasonable post. Only it upset the smug little consensus.
Also deleted yesterday was a post I made demonstrating two sides of Swordid.
Free speech my hole. Call it what it is. I.e. A platform to spew anonymous ignorance with impunity at groups and individuals not there to defend themselves, or to present their case.