Home

Chat 🔥🤬General Chat Thread

You can't debate it.

First of all you can't see or acknowledge that it is in fact a theory.

Now for a theory to hold, science says there must be no empirical observable fact that disproves it.

Your dogma has created a defense to that simple accepted process we use to discern truth.

As dogma does.
 
No, I said you can't debate it because you can't see or acknowledge that it is in fact a theory.

It is a dogmatic position. By definition. There is no arguing with dogma.

And what we hold as "facts" today, do you think they will all still be "facts" in a thousand years?

Now reread my previous posts to see has your comprehension improved on the basis of that insight.
 
Oh ffs.

This forum is full of facts which if they don't outright debunk, put all those theories on a questionable, spurious footing.

And not only inconvenient facts, also critical observations about the perceiving apparatus, and about the bias involved, that distorts perception.

But it is incredible this all has seemingly passed over your head.

It is somewhat akin to how all the facts about the church sexual abuse seemingly passed over the head of catholic dogmatists.

I.e. The facts of the abuse which put their dogmatic perception of certain other facts about the role of the church in peoples' lives to the test were discarded, deliberately and willfully ignored.

Just like that, read this forum, and my many posts on these topics, to learn of the facts that upset your white supremacist dogma, in particular these four theories, the central articles of the faith of your creed.

But you can't. You can't even take the first step to see them as something other than dogma.
 
Oh ffs.

This forum is full of facts which if they don't outright debunk, put all those theories on a questionable, spurious footing.

And not only inconvenient facts, also critical observations about the perceiving apparatus, and about the bias involved, that distorts perception.

But it is incredible this all has seemingly passed over your head.

It is somewhat akin to how all the facts about the church sexual abuse seemingly passed over the head of catholic dogmatists.

I.e. The facts of the abuse which put their dogmatic perception of certain other facts about the role of the church in peoples' lives to the test were discarded, deliberately and willfully ignored.

Just like that, read this forum, and my many posts on these topics, to learn of the facts that upset your white supremacist dogma, in particular these four theories, the central articles of the faith of your creed.

But you can't. You can't even take the first step to see them as something other than dogma.
You still haven't picked one, you're just waffling, you're a waffler, you've been years around here waffling
 
Jesus, you're not still on about that are you

Why in the world of donuts are you so captivated by another man's intimate life?

Gay?

Likely.

R u tryna use it as an excuse 4 not having bedded a bevy of Finnish beauties @ the w/e Mowl? 😄

There are Finnish beauties and there are Irish tramps.

I know which set I prefer.

And which you prefer.

Yep, the penny dropped with me about that with you some time ago.

You spend your life trying to understand cartoon strips.

You're fucking useless.

You don't get anything,

I get paid and I get laid.

You?

literally nothing.

Thought so.

I reckon if I had your brain for a day I'd die of boredom

At least it would be one day in your otherwise useless existence that you did in fact have a brain at all.

Why are replying to my post, what do your lies and cribbing about memes have to do with Mowl Mowl not getting anything (including what a meme is)? 🤔

Poor Jambo - his envy and jealousy tend to drive him crazier and crazier as day turns to night.

What a sad existence.

Mowl doesn't know what anything is

And yet here I am - the Pied Piper leading you - the rat.

I don't give a fuck what you or Dawkins think a "meme" is

Your fascination with all things male is rather worrying.

Is that why your dead Ma kicked the bucket?

She was embarrassed at what she shat out the day you were born?

Do you want to have a go at saying what was eh, memetic about my posts?

Oh dear.

Do you think you could do that without using the word antisemitic or antisemitism?

Woods.

Do you think you could do that with using the word antisemitic or antisemitism and something else (besides conspiracy theory, that is)?

Collect.

Both of those scenarios are highly, highly unlikely

Morgasm.
 
Why don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it? Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?

By the way, the film is sympathetic to the locals who are upset at the arrival of the refugees in the story.

"... But Loach does not attack the “deplorables” of the white working class; on the contrary. Thinking globally, acting locally, he treats them sympathetically; they are the same as their victims. Market forces and geopolitical interests have put them in the same position as the wretched Syrian incomers whom they have been encouraged to hate to feel good about themselves..."

No one is interested in your Telegram consensus sound bites, Jamboi, go away and watch the film and then say what you have to say. There's a good lad.
 
Why don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it?
Why would I want to do that, why would I need to do that? Anti-white propaganda is anti-white propaganda

Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?
Zzz..

By the way, the film is sympathetic to the locals who are upset at the arrival of the refugees in the story.
Is it, have you watched it? 🤔

"... But Loach does not attack the “deplorables” of the white working class; on the contrary. Thinking globally, acting locally, he treats them sympathetically; they are the same as their victims. Market forces and geopolitical interests have put them in the same position as the wretched Syrian incomers whom they have been encouraged to hate to feel good about themselves..."
ROTFLMAO 🤣

LOL @ The Guardian

No one is interested in your Telegram consensus sound bites, Jamboi, go away and watch the film and then say what you have to say. There's a good lad.
 
Why don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it? Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?

By the way, the film is sympathetic to the locals who are upset at the arrival of the refugees in the story.

"... But Loach does not attack the “deplorables” of the white working class; on the contrary. Thinking globally, acting locally, he treats them sympathetically; they are the same as their victims. Market forces and geopolitical interests have put them in the same position as the wretched Syrian incomers whom they have been encouraged to hate to feel good about themselves..."

No one is interested in your Telegram consensus sound bites, Jamboi, go away and watch the film and then say what you have to say. There's a good lad.
"Wretched Syrian incomers" in Ireland..

 


'We've tried everything except reevaluate our support for open borders and infinity migration, so we've decided to take our frustrations out on the one group of tourists who actually intend to go home.'

 
Top Bottom