Electricity
Member
Obviously it wasn't, a factA flat earth was "an empirical observable fact" for the medieval peasant too.
Obviously it wasn't, a factA flat earth was "an empirical observable fact" for the medieval peasant too.
Yes it was. Within the parameters of the medieval peasant consciousness.Obviously it wasn't, a fact
Of course I can, I do it every dayYou can't debate it.
What is? There were four items on your list, pick oneFirst of all you can't see or acknowledge that it is in fact a theory.
Now for a theory to hold, science says there must be no empirical observable fact that disproves it.
Your dogma has created a defense to that simple accepted process we use to discern truth.
As dogma does.
No, it wasn't a fact (duh), it was a beliefYes it was. Within the parameters of the medieval peasant consciousness.
WHAT is??No, I said you can't debate it because you can't see or acknowledge that it is in fact a theory.
It is a dogmatic position. By definition. There is no arguing with dogma.
And what we hold as "facts" today, do you think they will all still be "facts" in a thousand years?
Now reread my previous posts to see has your comprehension improved on the basis of that insight.
Make your case for all four or pick oneOh fuck off.
All of those four conjectures you listed above.
The question in all cases is, does the theory hold or not.
You still haven't picked one, you're just waffling, you're a waffler, you've been years around here wafflingOh ffs.
This forum is full of facts which if they don't outright debunk, put all those theories on a questionable, spurious footing.
And not only inconvenient facts, also critical observations about the perceiving apparatus, and about the bias involved, that distorts perception.
But it is incredible this all has seemingly passed over your head.
It is somewhat akin to how all the facts about the church sexual abuse seemingly passed over the head of catholic dogmatists.
I.e. The facts of the abuse which put their dogmatic perception of certain other facts about the role of the church in peoples' lives to the test were discarded, deliberately and willfully ignored.
Just like that, read this forum, and my many posts on these topics, to learn of the facts that upset your white supremacist dogma, in particular these four theories, the central articles of the faith of your creed.
But you can't. You can't even take the first step to see them as something other than dogma.
Jesus, you're not still on about that are you
R u tryna use it as an excuse 4 not having bedded a bevy of Finnish beauties @ the w/e Mowl?![]()
Yep, the penny dropped with me about that with you some time ago.
You don't get anything,
literally nothing.
I reckon if I had your brain for a day I'd die of boredom
Why are replying to my post, what do your lies and cribbing about memes have to do withMowl not getting anything (including what a meme is)?
![]()
Mowl doesn't know what anything is
I don't give a fuck what you or Dawkins think a "meme" is
Do you want to have a go at saying what was eh, memetic about my posts?
Do you think you could do that without using the word antisemitic or antisemitism?
Do you think you could do that with using the word antisemitic or antisemitism and something else (besides conspiracy theory, that is)?
Both of those scenarios are highly, highly unlikely
Why don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it? Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?https://t.me/saintharrison/7450 #BrotherhoodOfMan
Why would I want to do that, why would I need to do that? Anti-white propaganda is anti-white propagandaWhy don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it?
Zzz..Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?
Is it, have you watched it?By the way, the film is sympathetic to the locals who are upset at the arrival of the refugees in the story.
ROTFLMAO"... But Loach does not attack the “deplorables” of the white working class; on the contrary. Thinking globally, acting locally, he treats them sympathetically; they are the same as their victims. Market forces and geopolitical interests have put them in the same position as the wretched Syrian incomers whom they have been encouraged to hate to feel good about themselves..."
LOL @ The Guardian![]()
The Old Oak review – Ken Loach’s fierce final call for compassion and solidarity
A northern pub landlord confronts locals’ hostility towards Syrian refugees in Loach’s latest – and possibly last – piece of politically trenchant cinemawww.theguardian.com
No one is interested in your Telegram consensus sound bites, Jamboi, go away and watch the film and then say what you have to say. There's a good lad.
"Wretched Syrian incomers" in Ireland..Why don't you watch the film in its entirety, and then come back on here and write up your own opinion on it? Instead of posting ignorant Telegram comments of white supremacists?
By the way, the film is sympathetic to the locals who are upset at the arrival of the refugees in the story.
"... But Loach does not attack the “deplorables” of the white working class; on the contrary. Thinking globally, acting locally, he treats them sympathetically; they are the same as their victims. Market forces and geopolitical interests have put them in the same position as the wretched Syrian incomers whom they have been encouraged to hate to feel good about themselves..."
![]()
The Old Oak review – Ken Loach’s fierce final call for compassion and solidarity
A northern pub landlord confronts locals’ hostility towards Syrian refugees in Loach’s latest – and possibly last – piece of politically trenchant cinemawww.theguardian.com
No one is interested in your Telegram consensus sound bites, Jamboi, go away and watch the film and then say what you have to say. There's a good lad.