roc_abilly
Member
I wanted to make a start on this. I'll come back to it when I have more time.
The analysis needed to answer the question encompasses a system that has existed with certain purposes for a considerable time period.
Within this system encompasses other sub-systems and institutions, encompassing banks and our governments who create and uphold certain facilitative legal rights and privileges that create the mortgage market etc.
And in this country during the critical period 1997-2007 this system encompassed auctioneers, developers, publicans, politicians, estate agents, the public sector, mainstream media, land owners, the mediocre and their professional institutions, and so on.
Not forgetting the Irish people as a whole within this system who voted for the paradigm of strokes 1997-2007. Who voted for a paradigm where mortgage burden steadily increased, and who were happy to acquiesce in a paradigm where they would take on a 35 year double income mortgage, as compared to the previous generation's 20 years single income.
(Of course, as long as the following generation would take on 50 years, and so on... Sure didn't Japan get to the 100 year mortgage.) Then, when the paradigm came tumbling down, when later generations came close in fact to being saved from this greed, they voted in a party they knew would be the least sparing on the welfare class and other vulnerable etc.
But look. I need to separate the strands. Where to start with it.
With the young people who were cajoled into signing a piece of paper that promised 30 years of their working life in exchange for 317,500 or so euro, which promise was instantly monetised and instantly pocketed by developers, lawyers, estate agents, commissions to banking management, taxes to pay politician and public service fat cat salaries, ad infinitum?
Or with the fact that when the system came tumbling down it was rescued by the same people who were the financial architects of the system? Larry Fink of Blackrock, and Blackstone, KPMG etc.
(And putting aside for the moment the three white-wash reports with carefully restricted terms of reference that were claoimed to be investigations. I may return to that as well).
Yes, perhaps I will start with Blackstone and Larry Fink. Begin at the beginning.
Because Blackstone takes its name from Sir William Blackstone who writing in 1753 was the man most responsible for the philosophy of property ownership that property interests have ever since championed towards their own rights.
While Larry Fink was the guy who pretty much created single-handedly the market in mortgage backed securities back in the late 70's, and he was the first person that the Irish government reached out to when the system faltered. (Fink owns Blackrock, the largest money and asset manager in the world, which Blackstone financed for him in the beginning, and housed it in its offices, in return for a 50 per cent stake. And Blackrock of course was the outfit that undertook the bank stress-testing for us, analysing potential loan losses under "stressed conditions" in the four main Irish owned deposit banks - to inform the calculation of capital requirements under the PCAR etc.)
Anyway, I'm getting bogged down. For the first post I just wanted to throw a bunch of stuff up here. I will try to gradually whip it into shape. Let's properly answer the question of why housing is so expensive. Fuck this simplistic shit about immigrants etc.
So I will revert below with a post on Sir William Blackstone in the next couple of days. Let's get at the very roots of the whole thing. (After that I will do a post on the credit cycle and accompanying boom and bust, with an eye to the devices deployed post the 2007 bust that replaced the broken money markets with private equity and venture capital etc.).
To revert.
The analysis needed to answer the question encompasses a system that has existed with certain purposes for a considerable time period.
Within this system encompasses other sub-systems and institutions, encompassing banks and our governments who create and uphold certain facilitative legal rights and privileges that create the mortgage market etc.
And in this country during the critical period 1997-2007 this system encompassed auctioneers, developers, publicans, politicians, estate agents, the public sector, mainstream media, land owners, the mediocre and their professional institutions, and so on.
Not forgetting the Irish people as a whole within this system who voted for the paradigm of strokes 1997-2007. Who voted for a paradigm where mortgage burden steadily increased, and who were happy to acquiesce in a paradigm where they would take on a 35 year double income mortgage, as compared to the previous generation's 20 years single income.
(Of course, as long as the following generation would take on 50 years, and so on... Sure didn't Japan get to the 100 year mortgage.) Then, when the paradigm came tumbling down, when later generations came close in fact to being saved from this greed, they voted in a party they knew would be the least sparing on the welfare class and other vulnerable etc.
But look. I need to separate the strands. Where to start with it.
With the young people who were cajoled into signing a piece of paper that promised 30 years of their working life in exchange for 317,500 or so euro, which promise was instantly monetised and instantly pocketed by developers, lawyers, estate agents, commissions to banking management, taxes to pay politician and public service fat cat salaries, ad infinitum?
Or with the fact that when the system came tumbling down it was rescued by the same people who were the financial architects of the system? Larry Fink of Blackrock, and Blackstone, KPMG etc.
(And putting aside for the moment the three white-wash reports with carefully restricted terms of reference that were claoimed to be investigations. I may return to that as well).
Yes, perhaps I will start with Blackstone and Larry Fink. Begin at the beginning.
Because Blackstone takes its name from Sir William Blackstone who writing in 1753 was the man most responsible for the philosophy of property ownership that property interests have ever since championed towards their own rights.
While Larry Fink was the guy who pretty much created single-handedly the market in mortgage backed securities back in the late 70's, and he was the first person that the Irish government reached out to when the system faltered. (Fink owns Blackrock, the largest money and asset manager in the world, which Blackstone financed for him in the beginning, and housed it in its offices, in return for a 50 per cent stake. And Blackrock of course was the outfit that undertook the bank stress-testing for us, analysing potential loan losses under "stressed conditions" in the four main Irish owned deposit banks - to inform the calculation of capital requirements under the PCAR etc.)
Anyway, I'm getting bogged down. For the first post I just wanted to throw a bunch of stuff up here. I will try to gradually whip it into shape. Let's properly answer the question of why housing is so expensive. Fuck this simplistic shit about immigrants etc.
So I will revert below with a post on Sir William Blackstone in the next couple of days. Let's get at the very roots of the whole thing. (After that I will do a post on the credit cycle and accompanying boom and bust, with an eye to the devices deployed post the 2007 bust that replaced the broken money markets with private equity and venture capital etc.).
To revert.