Home

Are ye on the roight or the left, wha'?

She is only doing exactly what I do.

I.e. Digging in the facts, the reality, that give the lie to the rhetoric of these online global extremist movements, and digging into the disinformation, and radical agendas.

Just like I do on here when Jambo starts on with his little stock phrases, stock attitudes, stereotypes and packaged up radical meme of the day from some online "influencer" like Morgosh (or the crawling Mork Collett, the British White Supremacist neo Nazi who used to head up PR for the British National Party etc.)

I research and show the source of these phrases and ideas, and the genesis of them.

Like how the white supremacist Stormfront site started in 1996 is clearly in the frame when he starts on about "anti-whites" and "race realism" etc.

Or like how the organised Catholic activity also in the late nineties is in the frame when it is shown that today's anti trans culture wars, and the origins and genesis of the stock phrases and ideas deployed in those "wars", came directly, verbatim, from fundamentalist Catholic formal public representations and publications and books.

So on the one hand you can just be swept up in these stock phrases and pre packaged ideas, they have of course been designed to make explicit appeal to prejudice.

Or on the other hand you can become more conscious of their evolving, and what they evolved from, and why.

You need "researchers" prepared to dig a little to do that.

But of course the reason that ideologues hate all such researchers, paid or otherwise, is exactly because they bring evidence to the table that the ideologue needed to stay undiscovered.

And you know I used to observe similar in the antisemitic crusade that exploits the Palestinians to manipulate people into hate for Jews. That propaganda was notorious for always deliberately omitting the key facts needed to understand the events they were presenting.

So the necessary response of the Jews in that case was to make an effort to set up systems to gather the omitted evidence (like Memri) and then present that evidence.

But the ideologues dismissed that evidence on the very basis that funds were needed to organise to gather that evidence!

You see they need the stock chants and mantras to stand alone, the context they need and want is preexisting prejudice and a swirl of half truths based not in their own experience, but on heresay.

But when you add context, such as the voice of one of these transgender or cross dressing queers speaking honestly and with insight about his own experience and view of the world, or say you reveal the hideous face or institution or movement that first gave voice to these chants and mantras, mass popularised decades later, you change the context.

And that is the problem the likes of Jambo have with it.
 
Well, when he's just been handed his skinny arse, he just sits there like Paddy always does - waiting for the next big thing from his dubious sources, whom he quotes in their entirety - just to appear to have a point of view. Actually answering to his own gross stupidity is the last thing on his mind.

He knows when he's been outsmarted - and that's when the Jimmy Dawson For Real aspect kicks in.

Change the topic, shift the goalposts, hide behind irrelevancies, pretend he didn't see it and lie like a right fucking spoofer.

You can tell he was reared by a male alcoholic father who gave up on life after his missus died of whatever.

He's not just angry with you and I in particular - his gripe is with the wider world at large.

After forty-odd years on the planet he still can't tie his own bootlaces or wipe his own arse.

No fucking wonder he has no mates.
 
.... After forty-odd years on the planet he still can't tie his own bootlaces or wipe his own arse.

No fucking wonder he has no mates.
Yeah, and most of them are the same.

Because that's exactly where supremacism comes from - an inferiority complex.

Assured of the supremacy of their race at the same time as they are frustrated by the inferiority of their achievements.

A pathological need to look down on some "other".
 
Nearly time for my tea, but no. 13 in that bugster script caught my eye earlier.

13 Think before you talk. Talking about committing violence is a no-go. No talking about genocide tribunals because it makes us look dangerous...

Well Jambo usually manages to adhere fairly well to that little bit of advice. But remember he completely forgot himself on that private thread on Arsefields, when they were talking about the type of "nationalist" site they were going to have?

Jambo (Truth League) said:
If you want to have a nationalist site then you should be prepared to be an outlaw.. because nationalism is HIGHLY illegal... You want nationalism? Well then you better be prepared to take up a gu.. eh, sorry, don't want to say anything illegal... That's it, it's Game Over. I have no hope left. But if you want.. You better stop being scared about fucking talking about it.. because you're a racist... And every (subversive) geebag, who ever used that term (I know literally dozens on Irish political fora) will, when the glorious time comes, be put up against a wall and held accountable. May God have mercy...

Good man, Jambo. What are you going to write on your gu.. ?

buffalo-shooter-diary-057.jpg
 
We've been through all this before you stupid little child, and you didn't just get you arse handed to you, you had it reamed out to the point of prolapse.

You cannot not understand how many of your stupid bigoted posts could be presented in evidence, your choice of what you repost, your stupid memes and catchphrases.

Of course any jury in the world would agree that here was someone posting white supremacist ideology and therefore would be fairly described as a white supremacist.

And if after the court case you went down to the garda station, and went through some of those manifestos of white supremacist shooters, and showed them how much of what you post mirrored those manifestos, they'd take you away for good.

So you're not dealing with some Saul or Myles type in the real world, Jambo, you're dealing with people who see through you and typically don't like what they see.

The truth is not defamation.
 
I have already amply shown it to be true. By any meaningful metric or interpretation or any measure you like.

But white supremacism is dogma. You can't argue with a dogmatist.

But let's progress the discussion another step.

One characteristic of dogma is of course it is deliberately made immune to criticism. Its tenets are easily reoriented and reinterpreted when criticism hits. It is evasive.

In this case when criticism of one interpretation of "supremacism" precluded the development of the movement, of making their hatred acceptable, relatively, according to the general mood of the times. Of course the movement tries to gather under its flag the most people it can, so it must try to appear as palatable as it can to continue its growth.

Thus the rebranding to "white nationalists" and then, "racially realist", and all the nonsense surrounding that.

Anyway, moving on, also note that dogma is usually highly indicative of a cult. In this regard notice Jambo's white supremacist movement is:
  • Essentially apocalyptic ("replacement" etc.).
  • It promises a restoration of erstwhile culture (Christian, white European etc.).
  • It has 'prophets' and 'priests' (its "influencers" like Morgoth, Woods, Collett etc.).
  • Its prophets and priests promise their acolytes that their world will once again make sense to them.
  • Its prophets and priests make demands on their followers, giving them direction and purpose, they have to actively participate.
  • It recruits and proselytizes.
  • It not only recruits and proselytize, it generates an opposition. (e.g. "anti-whites", Jews, etc. It generates opposition because the state of feeling and the hostility is valuable to it.)
  • It excludes ("anti-whites", "normies", "shitlibs", "faggots", and so on.)
  • Its new entrants usually go though a ritual scepticism - they're encouraged to profess scepticism and have this overcome.
  • It is based on a kind of magical thinking.
  • It inspires a high degree of devotion in its acolytes (see Jambo)
And more. Enough here to show it is obviously a cult. So, why would I argue on here with a member of a cult on his own terms?

As I said before, sue me if you like, and I'll argue it in front of people who are outside the cult.
 
How many of today's libertarians would remain libertarian were they to successfully roll things back to the 19th century with 16-hour workdays (7 days a week)...having no pensions, no affordable healthcare, the return of slums etc? A lot of these basement dweller types seem to simply want to appear edgy, or contrarian for the sake of appearing contrarian. I doubt most have ever given much consideration to the type of world they'd be living in were their fantasies to one day become a reality.

Ebenezer Scrooge was meant to be a figure of scorn, not a source of inspiration.
 
... today's libertarians...
If we're talking about the likes of the gang on Arsefields, the correct term would be pseudo libertarian.

One illustration was their position on Covid and masks, before the protection of vaccines, that their individual rights included being "free" to infect others, "free" to set off trails of infection that could lead back to another free individual struggling to breathe on a ventilator.

In the exact same way they think they should be "free" to set off hateful viral memes that propagate and spread and ultimately cause persecution and even physical attacks on struggling minority communities.

Individual liberty does not extend to bringing harm on others.

Similarly, all their talk about commodity trading on the market, and by extension hoping for economic armageddon, and Putin to prevail, and so on, so that their trading bets materialise, never mind their political aspiration to be transported from the bottom of the pile to the top, is verging on pseudo libertarian, in view of its outcomes. Here's an interesting book about this element of it.


You see there are some profound implications of these type of beliefs.
 
They aren't 'libertarians'. People get annoyed with me when I point out that there are still peasants in every country in the world, including Europe and the Americas.

You can have two cars in the drive and still be a peasant. Libertarian is a very grand word which is used as cover by peasants who don't like change, don't like anything their parents wouldn't have been used to, are suspicious of outsiders, think someone is trying to take away the most profligate lifestyles in human history (between the 1960s and the 1990s, roughly) and just interpret libertarian as a political phrase meaning 'me fein'.

If they can't f*ck it, eat it, or spend it they'll interpret it as 'big state interference' in their lives. There were 2.5 billion people on the planet when I was in school and most of them were peasants.

Now there are 9 billion and the distribution of peasants hasn't changed much. It is just that a few million here and there have adopted sophistication like they'd put on a suit in the morning but the psychology underneath is the same.

Sounds misanthropic. But then again there is quite a lot to be said for misanthropy unless you like fairy stories instead of reality. Quite a lot of evidence for misanthropy being a properly cautious stance when dealing with humanity too.

The vast majority of people calling themselves libertarian, conservative, socialist, are just people putting on a suit. Mostly because they think it helps them blend in.

That's the truth of that one.
 
Yet another savage assault on Talbot St. and renewed talk of "more policing" as the answer to the situation etc.

As usual they miss the distinctions in the situation. Well they note that there is crack cocaine out there, and that it is replacing heroin as the drug of choice, however they miss the full implications of that fact.

If they were intelligent creatures they would look to the crack cocaine epidemics that swept the the most deprived areas in the UK and the US in the 1990s. They won't though. They have no idea what's coming down the track.

I personally remember the implementation of "more policing" in those areas in the UK. You literally couldn't walk out your door to the shops without a police helicopter shadowing you all the way.

Fuck all good it did.

Savage drug.
 
That's the Irish way though: wait until it's too broke to fix, then change tack.

Everything from housing to health care, work and taxes to quality of life, security and a positive outlook, shattered like broken mirrors on the roads and motorways. It has to be completely and utterly fucked before an attention is paid to it. Look at Ryan Tubridy today? Fired by Bakhurst for not being seen to be publicly 'sorry' for what happened.

He may not have arranged the payment scheme that landed him in hot water - but he didn't say or do anything about it either. Not until he absolutely HAD to under oath. The sheer arrogance of the little cunt? Let's see what he's worth on the open market. I can predict that he's not going to go after TV or radio work again - he'll become 'a writer' instead. Less hassle, less public scrutiny, less staff, more autonomy, more self-employed than a sole trader hired by the national broadcast authority.

RTE's a classic example of Irish hubris - it showed us all what knackers we really are.

 
I love how these alt-right YouTube basement-dwellers see themselves as latter-day Edmund Burkes, representing some deeply philosophical, centuries-old conservative tradition. As for verbosity, it's obvious the prat is reading off of a teleprompter, using words he came across after hours of scouring through dictionaries. I doubt he even understands the meaning of half the words he used in that brain fart of a video. It comes across as forced and unnatural as well - actual intelligent writers and social commentators don't use so many long-winded words in the space of a sentence or two.

The teleological, improvisation, leftist statist, misanthropic, eschatological...abstract Platonism...

Oh shut up, you're trying too hard. Using big words doesn't make you or your followers any less thick or clueless than they already are.
 
One important consideration in distinguishing the left - the difference between the (a) traditional left and (b) bourgeois middle-class liberalism. I'd imagine most of the anger of the present is directed at the latter.

Whereas the traditional left fought for workers' rights - bourgeois liberals can be, and are extremely patronising towards those with less in life. It's certainly understandable why certain bourgeois, lifestyle liberals infuriate what has become the new-right...which were effectively old school left-wing voters with conservative social values. These are the people most at risk of unemployment due to mass immigration, or automation. Bourgeois liberals on the other hand usually come from comfortable backgrounds, have jobs in the professions which you could say aren't threatened by open border rhetoric. I consider the RTE workplace to be a bastion of this bourgeois, middle-class outlook...hence patronising arseholes such as Ryan Tubridy.

There's something to be said concerning the traditional Left shooting itself in the foot by embracing identity politics (an American import by large measure)...at the expense of maintaining its traditional voting base, which more often than not had conservative social values. It's also left an opening for Thatcherite sorts to exploit this shortcoming. Yet Thatcherism, being another cheek of the same bourgeois arse has only made the lives of millions of poor a sheer misery. Jim Larkin had conservative social values. Perhaps we need more Jim Larkins and less condescending, smug, bourgeois, latte liberal types if we're to get back to square one. All the latter does is infuriate an already confused electorate.
 
Is anyone else fucking sick of these Yank culture wars, whether they originate from the American left or so-called American right?

That's basically all Arsefield's amounts to, aka. usless pissheads with nothing better to do than fight Yankee Dan's imaginary culture war on his behalf against libtards, libshits, bla bla bla.
 
Top Bottom