I regularly hear someone say to me about a book, "it's very well written", to recommend it to me.
But as I get older, I find the genuine and interesting ideas are more likely to be found in the "badly written" books.
It's similar to the likes of McGregor or Tommy Robinson. I'm not saying their ideas are better or worse than anyone else's. But they are genuine, even if "badly written" so to speak.
You can tell what they're saying comes from lived experience, and from speaking genuinely with their own communities. They are genuine opinions, based in the real world.
They are at odds with the likes of Jambo's or Micheal Martin's "opinions". I'm speaking of basically instititionalised fuckwits, reading from some kind of crib sheet or other, and who have developed their life's "convictions" on an entirely different basis.
So let anyone get up and even if they splutter or use some ill advised phrases, or cliches, or have a "rough" accent, or whatever, let them speak. Let's hear what they have to say; what they're trying to say.
I think the distinction between listenable and boo the arsehole off the stage should be if they're bleating from a hymn sheet, like Jambo or Micheal Martin or Simon Harris inevitably do.
Explain yourself. Where are YOU coming from. What do YOU want. Do YOUR best to try and get it across. Who cares about that American type "polished delivery" that we all seem to now expect (that more often than not covers up the saying of absolutely nothing that matters, or is novel, or actually means something).
That's all there is. Or should be, at least.