Lumpy Von Talbot
Member
Why ‘Justice’ for this thread and not ‘Culture and Community’ or ‘History’? Because we are a Republic and an aristocracy should not have any recognised place in our political systems. A discussion of remaining aristocracy privileged not by merit but by birth alone should really be in a History forum but unfortunately is still a contemporary phenomenon, whether it is a Viscount inheriting from an Earl or Paris Hilton inheriting Dadddy’s tax lawyers.
The point of the thread is to ask why there are still people accorded privileges just because they were born in a lucky bed.
How is this relevant to today? Well we can all see the latest crisis at the very highest level with the island next door which has a constitutional monarchy, officially, but in fact has no agreed constitution beyond matters of trade and private property rights and is looking like it may not have a monarchy much longer either.
Touchy subject and not one on which I’d choose to vote. One of the rare occasions when I’d probably get a vote in the UK on any referendum on the matter but determined long ago that the monarchy in the UK is not merely a political construct but it is also very much a cultural issue and on that basis I am not well enough informed to be able to make a sensible vote one way or another.
My only duty as a Republican abroad and living in a constitutional monarchy is not to let my own country down by being disrespectful of another culture’s cultural constructs, deeply interwoven in Englishness and the perception of it. If the monarchy in England is to go or survive, I don’t feel I could decently vote on that subject. I don’t think any views I might hold would be overly welcome in my local pub and the subject has never arisen there as far as I know. But common courtesy and the need to exhibit civilised behaviour around things such as standing for another country’s anthem, not disrespecting the Thai royal family in Thailand means not disrespecting cultural traditions if I live in England either.
Relevance to today: Besides the issues in England we have Scotland. A huge percentage of the land of Scotland is in the hands of private landowners who have profited from the invasive barbarity of the Highland Clearances when many Scots were thrown off land they had known time out of mind by foreign aristocrats who had decided that sheep were more profitable than croft-farms.
There are still four Dukes today I believe who own much of the private land in Scotland, and much of it the most beautiful land. Scotland will need to deal with this issue as part of the independence debate lest they end up independent only via a sliver of lowlands.
The King of Spain is now King Emeritus of Spain and hiding out in Abu Dhabi, fearful of what is about to emerge from tax investigations and corruption investigations around money flowing in and out of the roual grave and favour accounts from dubious characters.
Royalty appears to be on the run. The last absolute dictator with the aspect of a crowned king is sitting in the visibly dwindling pond in Rome that is known as the Vatican and was arguably the world’s first feudal corporation merged with majesty in the form of a crowned head.
Aristocracy. By-word for eventual decrepitude and degeneracy or tourist attraction that should be repainted and promoted for tourism? Legal place to play out theatre around large non-liquid assets such as country houses and estates?
I think their day is visibly done.
The point of the thread is to ask why there are still people accorded privileges just because they were born in a lucky bed.
How is this relevant to today? Well we can all see the latest crisis at the very highest level with the island next door which has a constitutional monarchy, officially, but in fact has no agreed constitution beyond matters of trade and private property rights and is looking like it may not have a monarchy much longer either.
Touchy subject and not one on which I’d choose to vote. One of the rare occasions when I’d probably get a vote in the UK on any referendum on the matter but determined long ago that the monarchy in the UK is not merely a political construct but it is also very much a cultural issue and on that basis I am not well enough informed to be able to make a sensible vote one way or another.
My only duty as a Republican abroad and living in a constitutional monarchy is not to let my own country down by being disrespectful of another culture’s cultural constructs, deeply interwoven in Englishness and the perception of it. If the monarchy in England is to go or survive, I don’t feel I could decently vote on that subject. I don’t think any views I might hold would be overly welcome in my local pub and the subject has never arisen there as far as I know. But common courtesy and the need to exhibit civilised behaviour around things such as standing for another country’s anthem, not disrespecting the Thai royal family in Thailand means not disrespecting cultural traditions if I live in England either.
Relevance to today: Besides the issues in England we have Scotland. A huge percentage of the land of Scotland is in the hands of private landowners who have profited from the invasive barbarity of the Highland Clearances when many Scots were thrown off land they had known time out of mind by foreign aristocrats who had decided that sheep were more profitable than croft-farms.
There are still four Dukes today I believe who own much of the private land in Scotland, and much of it the most beautiful land. Scotland will need to deal with this issue as part of the independence debate lest they end up independent only via a sliver of lowlands.
The King of Spain is now King Emeritus of Spain and hiding out in Abu Dhabi, fearful of what is about to emerge from tax investigations and corruption investigations around money flowing in and out of the roual grave and favour accounts from dubious characters.
Royalty appears to be on the run. The last absolute dictator with the aspect of a crowned king is sitting in the visibly dwindling pond in Rome that is known as the Vatican and was arguably the world’s first feudal corporation merged with majesty in the form of a crowned head.
Aristocracy. By-word for eventual decrepitude and degeneracy or tourist attraction that should be repainted and promoted for tourism? Legal place to play out theatre around large non-liquid assets such as country houses and estates?
I think their day is visibly done.