Electricity
Member
Coming soon......
I think we might start with that.I know how the mUh CoNsPIraCy tHeORy shtick is used by (trained) anti-white gimps like you
Mowl put it well in the previous thread:
Jambo's nationalism: can't speak any language except English and pure bollocks. Hates Irish people, which I'm willing to overlook as I do too. Loves English culture and the closest to Irish culture he finds himself, the more his feet angle themselves at ninety degrees as he mimics Liam Gallagher. Thinks Irish history is worthless old bollocks and refuses to engage with anything historic and Irish.
Speaks a language only the indoctrinated few understand and peppers his comments with tough guy type intimidation, but fails every time. Is single and will remain so until he finds a 100% Irish moth with cash to cover his costs. Has no life outside of online trolling, thinks women playing football is strictly for the gay quarter.
Doesn't have any moral compass, moral convictions, or respect for anything Irish, but demands to right to knock Irish culture every chance he gets. Has no online friends any more than offline friends. Needs a blowjob more than any white man this side of the Rio Grande.
Has a diction and lexicon so peppered with borrowed phrases from The Englishman's Guide To Being A Half-Baked Anarchist it's impossible to figure out what the fuck he's talking about. Is about as interesting as a car crash on the Sneem bypass between two culchies. Has all the originality of thought of a second Valamhic.
Has the personality of a self-loathing Weegie with a broken bottle in his one good hand, and the other picking his nose. Is about as large an embarrassment to Ireland as Ryan Tubridy. Is as boring as the day is long, has one single post which he's repeated non-stop for around eighteen months, and still hasn't made it clear what he's trying to say.
If youtube videos were gold, he'd still be a pauper.
If Telegrams were pork, he'd get food poisoning.
His benefit to this site? Zero.
His benefit to the planet at large? Even less.
His humour quotient? Likely the same as his life savings: fuck all.
A dole head, angry with life and world, probably hated by his own kin, a loner - but not in a good way. A wanker of extraordinary talent with a tissue and a tub of face-cleansing cream of his Ma's. Has about as many fans and as much respect for his efforts as the last mongrel Val slaughtered for supper.
And finally?
He has all the balls of a gimp in a box down in the basement.
Jambo's nationalism: can't speak any language except English and pure bollocks. Hates Irish people, which I'm willing to overlook as I do too. Loves English culture and the closest to Irish culture he finds himself, the more his feet angle themselves at ninety degrees as he mimics Liam Gallagher. Thinks Irish history is worthless old bollocks and refuses to engage with anything historic and Irish.
Speaks a language only the indoctrinated few understand and peppers his comments with tough guy type intimidation, but fails every time. Is single and will remain so until he finds a 100% Irish moth with cash to cover his costs. Has no life outside of online trolling, thinks women playing football is strictly for the gay quarter.
Doesn't have any moral compass, moral convictions, or respect for anything Irish, but demands to right to knock Irish culture every chance he gets. Has no online friends any more than offline friends. Needs a blowjob more than any white man this side of the Rio Grande.
Has a diction and lexicon so peppered with borrowed phrases from The Englishman's Guide To Being A Half-Baked Anarchist it's impossible to figure out what the fuck he's talking about. Is about as interesting as a car crash on the Sneem bypass between two culchies. Has all the originality of thought of a second Valamhic.
Has the personality of a self-loathing Weegie with a broken bottle in his one good hand, and the other picking his nose. Is about as large an embarrassment to Ireland as Ryan Tubridy. Is as boring as the day is long, has one single post which he's repeated non-stop for around eighteen months, and still hasn't made it clear what he's trying to say.
If youtube videos were gold, he'd still be a pauper.
If Telegrams were pork, he'd get food poisoning.
His benefit to this site? Zero.
His benefit to the planet at large? Even less.
His humour quotient? Likely the same as his life savings: fuck all.
A dole head, angry with life and world, probably hated by his own kin, a loner - but not in a good way. A wanker of extraordinary talent with a tissue and a tub of face-cleansing cream of his Ma's. Has about as many fans and as much respect for his efforts as the last mongrel Val slaughtered for supper.
And finally?
He has all the balls of a gimp in a box down in the basement.
Just to recap. on area covered before. We had a thread that asked:
Is "great replacement" theory a dogma, conspiracy, or actually a good theory that fits the observations?
lol It's incredible isn't it (how many times have I told him this)
How a term coined by a French author came to inspire violent white supremacists in America
www.voanews.com
(p.s. do not take this article as anything more than an introduction to the theory, we will develop our own opinions about the theory's implications on this thread, and our own interpretations. The article's author's perspective is his own, however it is a good article in setting out a good number of relevant facts as introduction.).
Now we find this theory turns out to be absolutely central to poster's @EElectricity worldview, in fact everything in his mind revolves around it, so it seems.
He even calls it "nationalism" and stridently claims that it is the only worthwhile central tenet of Irish nationalism.
So, perhaps it would be a good exercise to see exactly what's in it.
Or, conversely, if it is in fact a theory that does a terrible disservice to the facts - particularly if it excludes other important and relevant facts that it may be harmful to ignore (on the strength of their not fitting in with the theory). And what is the nature of this disservice, and implications of same.
And whether it has taken the form of dogma in the minds of its adherents like @EElectricity. And whether it is a pernicious dogma.
(Admittedly I am already lead to strongly suspect dogma may well be the case - owing to this poster's continually hysterical putting the leading, loaded question to me of "Are you also indifferent to the elimination of a European country by demographic changes?" - when did you stop beating your wife etc.
Of course, we know his theory predicts "the elimination of countries by demographic changes", along with other predictions. But, we have not yet resolved the question of whether or not it is a good theory capable of making good and relevant predictions about the nature of reality. So as a first step, let us try and resolve that question, eh...).
Jambo's simplistic narrow "chess brain" strikes again.Though he did not call it by its name, Gendron was referring to a far-right conspiracy theory known as the Great Replacement, which says Western elites, Jews in particular, are bringing in immigrants to replace whites.
That's it, that's the answer but it just won't sink in. At this stage, will we just put it down to roc being mentally retarded?
What I mean this time is that your brain seems to be able to only perform in pattern recognition.Jambo's simplistic narrow "chess brain" strikes again.
Jambo's simplistic narrow "chess brain" strikes again.
In that I explicitly wrote under the article, "... do not take this article as anything more than an introduction to the theory, we will develop our own opinions about the theory's implications on this thread, and our own interpretations. The article's author's perspective is his own, however it is a good article in setting out a good number of relevant facts as introduction...".
Clearly that writer focused on the element that regard so called "replacement" as something the elites are secretively working to bring about. No doubt there is a significant element out there that hold to that.
Whereas on that old thread, we said that we would discount that element, as it did not comprise the general thrust of your view. So instead we focused on the theoretical underpinnings that lead to the postulation of "replacement" in your case, i.e. assumptions about such elements of your theory as time scales involved, or assumptions about the trajectories of population growth functions, or assumptions about the political consequences of there being no outright majority in a democracy made up of "minorities", or assumptions about make up of voting constituencies, and so on.
But all you ever have in reply is, "... ooh, ooh, you mean it is just 'a far right conspiracy theory'...".
You're a moron, Jimmy. Perhaps it's time you stopped always opening your mouth to remove any doubt about that fact? Even the stunted, half minds you find on the likes of Arsefields are embarrassed by you.
Yes, and that's replacement theory. And it's what every link you've ever posted about it refers toListen you fucking moron:
Conspiracy theory: Something along lines of... Elites / Jews / EU bureaucrats / <Insert favourite cabal here> are deliberately importing non-white immigrants as part of a conspiracy against the white race.
There is no theory in replacement, it's an empirical, observable factTheory: Something along lines of... the current immigration trends lead to a range of phenomena that we may justly characterise as "replacement", including loss of political influence as the majority grouping, destruction of so called "white" culture and civilisation, and so on in that vein, dependent on certain assumptions holding that are needed to perpetuate the logic of the theory, including assumptions about the exact meaning and ideological import of the terms that we are using to describe the theory - terms like "white" and "race", etc.
The conspiracy theory element may or may not be an element included in the general theory depending on the person involved. We agreed at the outset of the original thread not to include it.
loflFor fucks sake.
Look, can I appeal to the gallery? You Arsefields chumps, Anderson, even, looking in.
Will you step in and say something here, I'm sure even you can see the distinction and its import.
Will you explain it to your old compadre Jimmy here for fucks sake.
Feel free to add your own input about where you think the argument should go, and what is the nub of the argument.
Because Jimmy is letting the side down really fucking badly here.